X
Don't miss a thing
We’d like to send you notifications for things that might interest you.
We can let you know when...
- someone follows you
- or replies to your comment
- or sends you a message
- etc.
We'll also give you a heads up when a really cool, funny, or hotly debated post is trending.
*You can customize or cancel notifications in your “Settings” page.
X
Login with Facebook
Login with Google
The last time you logged in, you used your account. Using a different login will create a new account.

Alan Dershowitz says Mueller report will be politically devestating. But...

X
Delete This Choozlet?
Are you sure you want to delete this choozlet?



X
Who upvoted...
X
Choozlet Image
Share on social media, your blog, etc.
 
X
Are you sure you want to delete this choozlet?



Alan Dershowitz says Mueller report will be politically devestating. But...
...it will not be a fair and unbiased report.

What a surprise.

I still don't get how a report that concludes that there was no criminal activity could be damaging. Someone either broke the law or they didn't.

If no laws were broken, what's the issue?
Created: November 27, 2018
Totals: 0 votes, 4 comments
Image | Widget | Id 
Choozlet Id: niUthJp1y9NN09n
 
0%
0 votes

Comments

2 weeks ago
I guess he needs to produce a couple of hundred pages of text to try to justify an investigation that never had any basis in reality and was not able to find any criminal activity.

In other words, he needs to pretend that this whole thing wasn't a farce and give the minions something to wet their pants over.

Put on your diapers, guys.
0
A week and 6 days ago
https://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/11/27/dershowitz-number-of-credible-witnesses-mueller-has-are-shrinking-by-the-day/

According to Dershowitz the number of credible witnesses that Mueller is "shrinking by the day."**

That kind of sucks for Mueller. But even more interesting is this assessment by Dershowitz.

"Mueller won't produce a neutral report or be fair. He will produce what he believes is going to be a devastating attack. He will put together everything. He will use information from Manafort and others without necessarily disclosing that they are liars."

In other words, a hardcore liberal--a true liberal to be fair, not a leftist--sees this as whole thing as a political stunt being led by a deceitful man in Mueller. It amazes me that so many still think this is a legitimate investigation. What does it take for someone to use a little common sense?
0
A week and 6 days ago
Who is this person you're defending? Trump? Who's that? The only Trump I recall is that Game Show host who served a single term as POTUS and was the butt of global humor. Is that the same guy?
0
A week and 6 days ago
Not sure. I'm not defending anyone that doesn't deserve to be defended. In the case of Trump in this particular issue, this investigation is a farce--a political stunt. Democrats should be ashamed. And yes, I would say the same if tables were turned and this were Obama or Hillary that are being investigated for something that simply didnt happen and using the cover of an investigation as a seek and destroy mission. Just look at the image for this post. Its a cartoon but there is some relevence. We started at Russia collusion and look where we are now, its a joke, The saddest part of the joke is that even if there were collusion with Russia, even that isnt a crime. Democrats, Mueller, et al, are using this entire investigation to sway public opinion--and that should scare everyone from either side of the political aisle.

Hey, if Trump did things truly illegal and worthy of removal from office, by all means it should be done. But literally everything he has been accused is either not illegal, or has no basis in evidence--and is all about politics.
0