X
Don't miss a thing
We’d like to send you notifications for things that might interest you.
We can let you know when...
- someone follows you
- or replies to your comment
- or sends you a message
- etc.
We'll also give you a heads up when a really cool, funny, or hotly debated post is trending.
*You can customize or cancel notifications in your “Settings” page.
X
Login with Facebook
Login with Google
The last time you logged in, you used your account. Using a different login will create a new account.

Dems to go after Trump's taxes. But...

X
Delete This Choozlet?
Are you sure you want to delete this choozlet?



X
Who upvoted...
X
Choozlet Image
Share on social media, your blog, etc.
 
X
Are you sure you want to delete this choozlet?



Dems to go after Trump's taxes. But...
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/big-fight-coming-trumps-tax-returns-181055217.html

"If Trump does resist, the House would have to go to court to force him to turn them over his returns. Lower courts might be likely to side with the House. But if Trump appealed, the case would land at the Supreme Court, newly refreshed with two Trump appointees, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh."

Bwahhhhahhhhhaaaa
Created: November 8, 2018
Totals: 0 votes, 6 comments
Image | Widget | Id 
Choozlet Id: E9vK85BQO4QTtB2
 
0%
0 votes

Comments

A week and 2 days ago
Trump wouldn't hide his taxes if he had nothing to hideI wouldn't count on Judges sworn to uphold the laws and the constituion protecting Trumps fat ass.

In the end, they are not Trumps **** boys
A week and 2 days ago
"Trump wouldn't hide his taxes if he had nothing to hide"

Not necessarily. This is the stupidest argument that is commonly put forth. Similar to the Kavanaugh should have called for an FBI investigation into himself if he were innocent,

If the police showed up at your doorstep and asked to come in and search the place because they think you committed a crime, would you let them? Only a fool would say yes.
-1
reply to: "Trump wouldn't hide his taxes if he had nothing to hide" Not necessarily. This is the stupidest argument that is commonly put forth. Similar to the Kavanaugh should have called for an FBI investigation into himself if he we
A week and 2 days ago
And I mean real police, not man-hookers role playing.
-1
A week and 2 days ago
Gorsuch and Kavanaugh are lifetime appointees to the Supreme Court. They gain nothing by being loyal to DJT. It's not as though their jobs are in jeopardy if they're not.

When push comes to shove, I personally don't give two ****s about Trump's tax returns when there are much bigger fish to fry regarding that sorry sack of ****
reply to: Gorsuch and Kavanaugh are lifetime appointees to the Supreme Court. They gain nothing by being loyal to DJT. It's not as though their jobs are in jeopardy if they're not. When push comes to shove, I personally don't give tw
A week and 2 days ago
That, to me, is the correct position to take. Whatever his taxes show prior to being president are irrelevant. Unless they show him to either:
1) Be less than 35 years old
2) not a natural born citizen
3) not having lived in the US for the last seven years.

I doubt they will show any of that.

If Democrats want to go after him, have at it--for things he did as president (or collusion while campaigning if anyone still believes that)

The problem is that there seems to be no actual law-breaking. So, the instinct of the radical left is to pull out all stops to find something.
0
reply to: Gorsuch and Kavanaugh are lifetime appointees to the Supreme Court. They gain nothing by being loyal to DJT. It's not as though their jobs are in jeopardy if they're not. When push comes to shove, I personally don't give tw
A week and a day ago
They gain nothing by being loyal to DJT

Correct. The problem for the left is that they will be fair. If there is no constitutional reason to vote against Trump, they won't act as activists as a liberal appointee would do.
0