X
Don't miss a thing
We’d like to send you notifications for things that might interest you.
We can let you know when...
- someone follows you
- or replies to your comment
- or sends you a message
- etc.
We'll also give you a heads up when a really cool, funny, or hotly debated post is trending.
*You can customize or cancel notifications in your “Settings” page.
X
Login with Facebook
Login with Google
The last time you logged in, you used your account. Using a different login will create a new account.

Should certain people be sterilized for the good of the planet?

X
Delete This Choozlet?
Are you sure you want to delete this choozlet?



X
Who upvoted...
X
Choozlet Image
Share on social media, your blog, etc.
 
X
Are you sure you want to delete this choozlet?



Should certain people be sterilized for the good of the planet?
Should certain people be sterilized for the good of the planet?
Created: April 15, 2018
By: Hellno
Totals: 14 votes, 24 comments
Image | Widget | Id 
Choozlet Id: oiVtio0ana7oaen
 
Oh yes! These people:
36%
5 votes
No
64%
9 votes

Comments

Voted: Oh yes! These people:
8 months ago
Yes, but I believe that was deemed unconstitutional.
Voted: Oh yes! These people:
8 months ago
Most definitely.
reply to: Most definitely.
8 months ago
I think think of a few but I'll just keep that to myself... lol
reply to: I think think of a few but I'll just keep that to myself... lol
Voted: Oh yes! These people:
8 months ago
I bet I can guess who a few of them are. I bet they are on my list also. . .
reply to: I bet I can guess who a few of them are. I bet they are on my list also. . .
8 months ago
Yep!
reply to: Yep!
Voted: Oh yes! These people:
7 months ago
Good ole Joe just shared this post on FB in his lame group. He calls us Fascists. SMH
reply to: Good ole Joe just shared this post on FB in his lame group. He calls us Fascists. SMH
7 months ago
Hahahaha! He doesn't know the meaning of the word 'treason', so I doubt he knows the meaning of 'fascists' either. LOL
8 months ago
Yes, but who gets to decide who?
reply to: Yes, but who gets to decide who?
8 months ago
I dunno? Hopefully not Congress... in fact, maybe they should be the first to be sterilized? lol
reply to: I dunno? Hopefully not Congress... in fact, maybe they should be the first to be sterilized? lol
Voted: Oh yes! These people:
reply to: I dunno? Hopefully not Congress... in fact, maybe they should be the first to be sterilized? lol
8 months ago
Not just them, but anyone claiming to be a politician.
0
Voted: Oh yes! These people:
8 months ago
Lers just stop propping up losers with welfare and foodstamps and all of our other givaways. Then Darwin will make the choice.
reply to: Lers just stop propping up losers with welfare and foodstamps and all of our other givaways. Then Darwin will make the choice.
Voted: Oh yes! These people:
heard of this woman who popped out like 5 kids and the state kept taking them cause she was a junkie, prime candidate, right there!
reply to: Lers just stop propping up losers with welfare and foodstamps and all of our other givaways. Then Darwin will make the choice.
Voted: Oh yes! These people:
ever since they expanded the welfare program, there has been a rash of things like that!
Voted: No
8 months ago
I'm not surprised that the same people who want to write laws on women's bodies would also be pro-sterilization. What an awful notion.
Voted: No
8 months ago
As a follower, believer of Jesus Christ...
I do NOT approve of abortions or sterilization for women.
Both actions are wrong. IMHO
7 months ago
Yep. CONSERVATIVES!!!!!
Voted: Oh yes! These people:
7 months ago
Why is that bad and abortion is a good option? People are OK with choosing to abort the sex child they don't want, or a child with a birth defect. It's foolproof birth control.
Voted: No
7 months ago
Forced sterilization is a slippery slope that does not permit any recovery. Who decides and by what criteria would that decision be reached? How would it be regulated and by whom? Would there be an appeal process? Would it/could it be used as an enforceable population control? Would it not be on par with the evil eugenics schemes and/or practices of M. Sanger and A. Hitler? What would it say about our culture's moral/ethical value of human life?

No, even though a very real temptation would exist to use it only for 'good,' the procedure itself belies any real good for either the one acting, the one acted upon, or the greater society. That said, were it ever to be made legal, the strictest of limiting controls would have to be exercised to maintain the tightest of limiting boundaries.
Voted: No
7 months ago
Hell no.

Each and every time we think there should be a law mandating or forbiding something...we should pause to consider how we'd like others controlling us in such a way...because the reins of power get passed every so often. Always.
Voted: No
7 months ago
What!!!!!!!! That would be a NO!
Voted: Oh yes! These people:
7 months ago
People that abuse children and those that do drugs while pregnant. This includes the "fathers."
7 months ago
I don't find commentary and posts like this amusing.
This is exactly why I ****ing hate consersvatives
Your inhumanity astounds me
Voted: Oh yes! These people:
I'm starting to think that ppl should be drug tested if they want to have any kids.
0