X
Don't miss a thing
We’d like to send you notifications for things that might interest you.
We can let you know when...
- someone follows you
- or replies to your comment
- or sends you a message
- etc.
We'll also give you a heads up when a really cool, funny, or hotly debated post is trending.
*You can customize or cancel notifications in your “Settings” page.
X
Login with Facebook
Login with Google
The last time you logged in, you used your account. Using a different login will create a new account.

Should homosexuals be allowed to marry?

X
Delete This Choozlet?
Are you sure you want to delete this choozlet?



X
Who upvoted...
X
Choozlet Image
Share on social media, your blog, etc.
 
X
Are you sure you want to delete this choozlet?



I realize gay marriage is currently legal, I want to know if you think it should be or if the Scotus made a poor decision based on feelings rather than facts.
Created: April 16, 2018
Totals: 19 votes, 143 comments
Image | Widget | Id 
Choozlet Id: gbNla6Rm71BmNRF
 
Yes, by all means
63%
12 votes
No, not under any circumstances
26%
5 votes
I am open minded and remain unconvinced by either side
11%
2 votes

Comments

Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Of course they should be allowed to marry. There is not one single good reason they should NOT be allowed to marry.
reply to: Of course they should be allowed to marry. There is not one single good reason they should NOT be allowed to marry.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
The laws of nature, the word of God, the destruction of civilization.

Yeah, those aren't valid reasons.
reply to: The laws of nature, the word of God, the destruction of civilization. Yeah, those aren't valid reasons.
Voted: Yes, by all means
I haven't gotten struck by lightening for supporting LGBT rights.. so the word of God is invalid.
reply to: The laws of nature, the word of God, the destruction of civilization. Yeah, those aren't valid reasons.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
So you feel just as strongly about divorce, and adultry, right?
reply to: So you feel just as strongly about divorce, and adultry, right?
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Yes.
reply to: Yes.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Yet, in another poll you answered that you preferred Trump over Obama. Trump.. a man who has had several divorces, cheated on his-wives multiple times. Obama has done none of those things. This shows me, you dont feel as strongly about divorce and adultry matters little to you. So the "word of God" really isnt important to you as long as it doesnt gross you out. I think you should look up the word hypocrite. Or I could provide the definition.
reply to: Yet, in another poll you answered that you preferred Trump over Obama. Trump.. a man who has had several divorces, cheated on his-wives multiple times. Obama has done none of those things. This shows me, you dont feel as stro
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
My concern when voting is who will do a better job. I am not concerned, in that context, with divorces, cheating, and things like that as it does not affect ability. In Trump I see a man that is successful beyond most people's imaginations. In Obama, I saw a man that had never accomplished a thing in his life.
reply to: My concern when voting is who will do a better job. I am not concerned, in that context, with divorces, cheating, and things like that as it does not affect ability. In Trump I see a man that is successful beyond most people'
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Uh huh... hypocrite. The word of god means nothing to you unless it fits your narrative. Either you live a godly life or you dont.. picking and choosing to suit your needs is not.
reply to: Uh huh... hypocrite. The word of god means nothing to you unless it fits your narrative. Either you live a godly life or you dont.. picking and choosing to suit your needs is not.
Voted: No, not under any circumstances
3 months ago
And you've gained your vast knowledge of the Scriptures and theology and rel. ethics from where again? And you are significantly capable of distinguishing the Left and Righ hand of God - God's work in the world and His work in the Church? Please! Enlighten us!!
reply to: Uh huh... hypocrite. The word of god means nothing to you unless it fits your narrative. Either you live a godly life or you dont.. picking and choosing to suit your needs is not.
3 months ago
There is always render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's. I may feel that someone is qualified for a job that I don't agree with in any other fashion BUT that they are qualified for a job... And I can work with that person and be civil and pleasant without calling that person a friend or brother or sister. If we don't pick and choose based on need to at least some extent than we are stupid.
0
reply to: Yet, in another poll you answered that you preferred Trump over Obama. Trump.. a man who has had several divorces, cheated on his-wives multiple times. Obama has done none of those things. This shows me, you dont feel as stro
Voted: Yes, by all means
More than a month ago
0
reply to: The laws of nature, the word of God, the destruction of civilization. Yeah, those aren't valid reasons.
More than a month ago
Don't you think you're being a little overdramatic? The laws of nature - several animal species are homosexual; the word of God - he created Man in his image which makes him OK with homosexuality; the destruction of civilization - there are plenty of heterosexuals to keep the earth populated (or over-populated). And, if those aren't good enough reasons, who do you think is adopting so many of the unwanted babies?
reply to: Don't you think you're being a little overdramatic? The laws of nature - several animal species are homosexual; the word of God - he created Man in his image which makes him OK with homosexuality; the destruction of civilizat
Voted: Yes, by all means
More than a month ago
reply to: https://www.choozler.com/userimg/niUthJp1y9N0p9s.jpg
More than a month ago
Thank you.
0
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Of course they should be able to marry. And raise a family too if they want.
reply to: Of course they should be able to marry. And raise a family too if they want.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Yeah, just what every child needs. To be the subject of a social experiment.
reply to: Yeah, just what every child needs. To be the subject of a social experiment.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Oh, let me see. I personally know of kids I had grown up with whose mother or father were a closet homosexual, or maybe even both. And the kid(s,) came out fine heterosexuals.. Now as an adult I personally know a couple of same sex partners who are raising a family. And each and everyone's kids did extremely well in school and have moved on to state and private universities, and some. SO, if it is some kind of social experiment it seems to be working out well.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14972701
reply to: Oh, let me see. I personally know of kids I had grown up with whose mother or father were a closet homosexual, or maybe even both. And the kid(s,) came out fine heterosexuals.. Now as an adult I personally know a couple of
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
So your proof is the two or three families that are okay.? And that's enough to overturn what we have learned over thousands of years about the nuclear family? Brilliant.
reply to: So your proof is the two or three families that are okay.? And that's enough to overturn what we have learned over thousands of years about the nuclear family? Brilliant.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Like what, matricide, patricide, fratricide, homicide?
reply to: Like what, matricide, patricide, fratricide, homicide?
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Foolish argument. You're going to make the case that these things happen because someone comes from a nuclear family?
reply to: Foolish argument. You're going to make the case that these things happen because someone comes from a nuclear family?
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
558481014515100&id=516366018726600
0
reply to: Yeah, just what every child needs. To be the subject of a social experiment.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
There have been homosexuals since the beginning of the human race.
reply to: There have been homosexuals since the beginning of the human race.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
And?
reply to: And?
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
I was just stating a fact.
reply to: I was just stating a fact.
Voted: No, not under any circumstances
3 months ago
A fact with little to no importance.
reply to: A fact with little to no importance.
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
I think if heteros are allowed to be married, then should gays. Fair is fair.
reply to: There have been homosexuals since the beginning of the human race.
More than a month ago
As well as the existence of homosexuality in several animal species.
0
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Even if I were in favor, I would to the right thing and temper my emotions for the sake of society and, more importantly, the children involved. You know the ones raised by these "families"

For thousands of years we have had traditional families. Not only is a man/woman necessary to create a family, but it is human nature for a mother/father to nuture a child. That is how we have evolved. That is a fact.

To support that, we know that children that do not have both parents are at a disadvantage statistically. This is a fact.

Knowing this, is it really such a stretch to say that a child without male/female parents is also at a disadvantage? That isnt mean or rude. It is asking a very serious and reasonable question. Can you proponents of gay parents even admit to the POSSIBILITY that the small sample of kids from these families pales in comparison to the sample from all over the world for thousands of years as far as what effect it MAY have?

I think that would be a very normal concern. So, why are we willing to make children the subject of this experiment?
-1
reply to: Even if I were in favor, I would to the right thing and temper my emotions for the sake of society and, more importantly, the children involved. You know the ones raised by these "families" For thousands of years we have had
More than a month ago
Do you think children who are raised in foster homes or homes where they are abused physically and mentally, even when there is a man/woman situation, are better off than a child that is adopted by two same sex people who love then, care for them and nurture them? Do you think only women are capable of nurturing.
Voted: Yes, by all means
If you don't support same sex marriage you're not a true American.
reply to: If you don't support same sex marriage you're not a true American.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
reply to: If you don't support same sex marriage you're not a true American.
Voted: No, not under any circumstances
3 months ago
What a dipshidiot!
reply to: What a dipshidiot!
Voted: Yes, by all means
Shut up you douchekabob
reply to: What a dipshidiot!
Voted: Yes, by all means
I can make up words too
Voted: No, not under any circumstances
4 months ago
no they shouldn't, our laws should be like Russia's laws franckly, its legal, but don;t go parading your lifestyle in the streets, don;t force us to agree with your lifestyle, its not normal, it isn;t something to be proud of, keep it to yourself.

and being that it is legal now, do NOT force christians to marry you or make you cakes. free society, find someone willing to do it. instead of being fascists and demanding others to bow to your beliefs
reply to: no they shouldn't, our laws should be like Russia's laws franckly, its legal, but don;t go parading your lifestyle in the streets, don;t force us to agree with your lifestyle, its not normal, it isn;t something to be proud of
Voted: Yes, by all means
What's the deal with so many Christians owning bakeries anyway? Why doesn't a Satanist own one that would be badass.
reply to: no they shouldn't, our laws should be like Russia's laws franckly, its legal, but don;t go parading your lifestyle in the streets, don;t force us to agree with your lifestyle, its not normal, it isn;t something to be proud of
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
You say you dont "parade your lifestyle" as a heterosexual, but i can almost guaruntee that is false.

You say it is wrong and fascist for them to want equal treatment, yet for hundreds of years they were forced to bow to your beliefs. Careful... your hypocrisy is showing.
reply to: no they shouldn't, our laws should be like Russia's laws franckly, its legal, but don;t go parading your lifestyle in the streets, don;t force us to agree with your lifestyle, its not normal, it isn;t something to be proud of
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Wait, Russian laws? Well, that certainly explains a lot.
reply to: What's the deal with so many Christians owning bakeries anyway? Why doesn't a Satanist own one that would be badass.
Voted: I am open minded and remain unconvinced by either side
4 months ago
Maybe you could find a nice Muslim bakery to bake a gay wedding cake?
reply to: Maybe you could find a nice Muslim bakery to bake a gay wedding cake?
Voted: No, not under any circumstances
4 months ago
they only attack christians because they think we are easy targets
reply to: What's the deal with so many Christians owning bakeries anyway? Why doesn't a Satanist own one that would be badass.
Voted: I am open minded and remain unconvinced by either side
4 months ago
reply to: You say you dont "parade your lifestyle" as a heterosexual, but i can almost guaruntee that is false. You say it is wrong and fascist for them to want equal treatment, yet for hundreds of years they were forced to bow to you
Voted: No, not under any circumstances
4 months ago
you have had equal rights since a VERY LONG time. what is happening today is not equal rights it throat shoving. and just because it happened to others in the past does not give those others the right to do so now, thats HYPOCRICY!

I do not owe you or anyone a dang thing for what happened in the past. get over it!

demanding a bakery to bake them a cake or destroy their company is not much different then christian going to an atheist company and demanding they do something christian for them. do you know how many bakeries the gay couple past (that WOULD have baked them a cake) just to go to the one that didn;t want to go against their beliefs, just so they could cry victimhood? these liberals should grow up already. so a company didn;t bake you a cake, BOO HOO! find one that will. your not being killed. or discriminated against so get over it
reply to: you have had equal rights since a VERY LONG time. what is happening today is not equal rights it throat shoving. and just because it happened to others in the past does not give those others the right to do so now, thats HYPO
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
You are right. I as a hereosexual have had equal marriage rights for awhile.

Furthermore, I never asked you for anything. I think you need to take your heart meds.
reply to: You say you dont "parade your lifestyle" as a heterosexual, but i can almost guaruntee that is false. You say it is wrong and fascist for them to want equal treatment, yet for hundreds of years they were forced to bow to you
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
"but i can almost guaruntee that is false." right...
-1
reply to: "but i can almost guaruntee that is false." right... http://www.proudout.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/facebook_event_492843370917659.jpg
3 months ago
THOSE GUYS ARE HOT!!!!!!!!!!
reply to: THOSE GUYS ARE HOT!!!!!!!!!!
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Yeah they are.
reply to: You say you dont "parade your lifestyle" as a heterosexual, but i can almost guaruntee that is false. You say it is wrong and fascist for them to want equal treatment, yet for hundreds of years they were forced to bow to you
Voted: No, not under any circumstances
3 months ago
Again you accuse of hypocrisy, though you have failed to prove the same. A waste of your words, I fear.
-1
reply to: Again you accuse of hypocrisy, though you have failed to prove the same. A waste of your words, I fear.
3 months ago
LOL

You jealous gay guys are hotter than you
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
If you have kids and both you and your spouse we're going to die tomorrow, and you are the choice of two families to raise them. All other things are equal but one is a heterosexual couple and one is a homosexual couple. All else being equal remember, which couple do you choose?
reply to: If you have kids and both you and your spouse we're going to die tomorrow, and you are the choice of two families to raise them. All other things are equal but one is a heterosexual couple and one is a homosexual couple. All
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Get ready for the cop out of... i dont care. I would let somebody else pick
-1
reply to: If you have kids and both you and your spouse we're going to die tomorrow, and you are the choice of two families to raise them. All other things are equal but one is a heterosexual couple and one is a homosexual couple. All
Voted: Yes, by all means
I'd choose the couple who I felt were better people and who would raise my son better. For all I know, the heterosexual couple could be bat**** crazy psycho rapists.
reply to: If you have kids and both you and your spouse we're going to die tomorrow, and you are the choice of two families to raise them. All other things are equal but one is a heterosexual couple and one is a homosexual couple. All
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
The couple who is most suited to raise them would be my choice.
reply to: If you have kids and both you and your spouse we're going to die tomorrow, and you are the choice of two families to raise them. All other things are equal but one is a heterosexual couple and one is a homosexual couple. All
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Who am I and my children closer to? Who do they have a better relationship with? It is impossible for ALL things to be equal.
0
reply to: I'd choose the couple who I felt were better people and who would raise my son better. For all I know, the heterosexual couple could be batshit crazy psycho rapists.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
I was very clear in stating all other things being equal. I even said it twice. So aside from the orientation all other things are equal
-1
reply to: I was very clear in stating all other things being equal. I even said it twice. So aside from the orientation all other things are equal
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Well, then let me reiterate. The couple regardless of orientation who is best suited to raise them would be my choice.
reply to: Well, then let me reiterate. The couple regardless of orientation who is best suited to raise them would be my choice.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
You must have a learning disability. All other things being equal. You understand? All other things are equal pick one
-1
reply to: You must have a learning disability. All other things being equal. You understand? All other things are equal pick one
Voted: Yes, by all means
Whoa dude.. you feel very strongly about this. How is it relevant whether they have a **** or twat?
reply to: Whoa dude.. you feel very strongly about this. How is it relevant whether they have a cock or twat?
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
This is what happens when someone takes an indefensible position. They won't answer the question and when pressed try to turn it around. It's a very simple question.
reply to: I was very clear in stating all other things being equal. I even said it twice. So aside from the orientation all other things are equal
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Impossible. If this helps. My children's legal guardians are my sister. And her WIFE.
reply to: Impossible. If this helps. My children's legal guardians are my sister. And her WIFE.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
But you are dodging the question. Its a hypothetical, but why are you afraid to answer the question? All things being equal and you have to choose one of the two couple to raise your children, which couple do you pick?
-1
reply to: But you are dodging the question. Its a hypothetical, but why are you afraid to answer the question? All things being equal and you have to choose one of the two couple to raise your children, which couple do you pick?
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
If all are equal.. then it doesnt matter. One kid can go to the hereosexual xouple the other to the homosexual. After all they are exactlty the same.
reply to: If all are equal.. then it doesnt matter. One kid can go to the hereosexual xouple the other to the homosexual. After all they are exactlty the same.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
"If all are equal.. then it doesnt matter. One kid can go to the hereosexual couple the other to the homosexual."

Then you are a horrible parent.
reply to: "If all are equal.. then it doesnt matter. One kid can go to the hereosexual couple the other to the homosexual." Then you are a horrible parent.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Says you.
reply to: "If all are equal.. then it doesnt matter. One kid can go to the hereosexual couple the other to the homosexual." Then you are a horrible parent.
Voted: No, not under any circumstances
3 months ago
Absolutely! To rip siblings apart for the sake of some perverted PC is beyond disgusting. And they would attempt to convince people they are in total harmony with "family,"
-1
reply to: Absolutely! To rip siblings apart for the sake of some perverted PC is beyond disgusting. And they would attempt to convince people they are in total harmony with "family,"
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
It would never happen. I already stated that my children (both of them) would go to my sister and her wife. But that wasnt good enough. Now sit and spin.
reply to: Absolutely! To rip siblings apart for the sake of some perverted PC is beyond disgusting. And they would attempt to convince people they are in total harmony with "family,"
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
And all because she can't admit that she would choose a hetero couple over a homo couple.
-1
reply to: It would never happen. I already stated that my children (both of them) would go to my sister and her wife. But that wasnt good enough. Now sit and spin.
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Its a hypothetical question! I know you get it. And it is clear that you are afraid to give your honest answer. Which is understandable because the only reasonable answer shows you to be a hypocrite.
-1
reply to: The couple who is most suited to raise them would be my choice.
Voted: I am open minded and remain unconvinced by either side
4 months ago
That's what I would look for first. I already have a living will/trust set up for my critters and everyone knows who goes where.
reply to: That's what I would look for first. I already have a living will/trust set up for my critters and everyone knows who goes where.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Stop dodging the question. Which couple would you pick? The hetero or the homo?
-1
reply to: Who am I and my children closer to? Who do they have a better relationship with? It is impossible for ALL things to be equal.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
It is called hypothetical situation. It used to get to the heart of a matter and really zero in the truth behind an answer. When answers to hypothetical questions are avoided it is because the person answering knows that his/er answer doesnt match what she espouses.

But, of course, I didnt need to tell you that. We all know what a hypothetical question is and what your avoidance means.

You dont want to admit that, given the hypothetical with all other things being equal, you would choose the hetero family.
-1
Voted: I am open minded and remain unconvinced by either side
4 months ago
Yes
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Yeah, I'm pretty Libertarian... I don't care.
reply to: Yeah, I'm pretty Libertarian... I don't care.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
I'm writing to the RNC and telling on you.
reply to: I'm writing to the RNC and telling on you.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Okay? I've told you a million times, I'm not a Republican.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
If a man wants a man, and a woman wants a woman, that is their decision... not anyone elses. I don't see how their marriages are hurting anyone.
reply to: If a man wants a man, and a woman wants a woman, that is their decision... not anyone elses. I don't see how their marriages are hurting anyone.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
The problem is that it isnt a marriage. Until the definition was changed for political reasons. The word marriage had a definition a man and a woman. So when two men or two women are together that's fine. It's just not marriage. If you ask for a glass of milk and I give you a glass of soda it would be wrong even if I told you that this is still a glass of milk it's just made with water and sugar instead of from a cow. I just changed the definition of milk does that make the soda that I gave you a glass of milk?
reply to: The problem is that it isnt a marriage. Until the definition was changed for political reasons. The word marriage had a definition a man and a woman. So when two men or two women are together that's fine. It's just not marria
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
This is not a theocracy. We live in America and all people are supposed to have constitutional rights. You know freedom to choose, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Not allowing them to get married is IMO, discrimination.
reply to: The problem is that it isnt a marriage. Until the definition was changed for political reasons. The word marriage had a definition a man and a woman. So when two men or two women are together that's fine. It's just not marria
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Actually that's not quite accurate. The idea of marriage is rooted in the sense of sexual encounter. When a couple had sex they were married.
0
reply to: Actually that's not quite accurate. The idea of marriage is rooted in the sense of sexual encounter. When a couple had sex they were married.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Okay fine. Whatever two men or two women do is not, by definition, sex. It may be sexual, but it is not sex. Sex is a very specific action where... one thing goes into another thing
0
reply to: Okay fine. Whatever two men or two women do is not, by definition, sex. It may be sexual, but it is not sex. Sex is a very specific action where... one thing goes into another thing
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
If you aren't mature enough to handle it, then don't do it.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
I don't see why not.... It doesn't affect me.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
The SCOTUS has already ruled in favor of same-sex marriage, and said they are not going to revisit this issue.
reply to: The SCOTUS has already ruled in favor of same-sex marriage, and said they are not going to revisit this issue.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
OK, so I guess you agree with the Citizens United ruling?
0
and the pandora's box has been opened.
4 months ago
I don't believe we should require governmental permission to marry.
reply to: I don't believe we should require governmental permission to marry.
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
But then Democrats will start marrying children, relatives, and farm animals.
0
reply to: I don't believe we should require governmental permission to marry.
and no one should be forced to have anything to do with a gay ceremony if they don't want.
reply to: But then Democrats will start marrying children, relatives, and farm animals.
4 months ago
People intent on having sex with children, relatives, and farm animals do not refrain from doing so because they lack a permission slip from the government, Tommy. Hence the reason we have laws against child abuse and beastiality. What consenting adults do is not my business, but societal norms tend to keep most people in check when close relatives get too close...and those it wouldn't, it isn't now.
reply to: and no one should be forced to have anything to do with a gay ceremony if they don't want.
4 months ago
Agreed.
Voted: No, not under any circumstances
4 months ago
Non PC Post du jour: "No"
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
reply to: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f0/40/30/f04030f31ad2c00ae1f066279b11a891.jpg
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
Voted: No, not under any circumstances
4 months ago
Whatever
0
Voted: Yes, by all means
4 months ago
I have been selling a few things on FB yard sale groups. The man that came and bought something from me. He is gay (but I did not know it at the time). He was just like any other person I have ever met. After he was gone I looked at his FB page. He is married to a man. Hey I wish him happiness in his life.
reply to: I have been selling a few things on FB yard sale groups. The man that came and bought something from me. He is gay (but I did not know it at the time). He was just like any other person I have ever met. After he was gone I lo
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
He is one of the ones that hides their gayness well.
0
reply to: He is one of the ones that hides their gayness well.
3 months ago
Who care...so do you
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
reply to: https://i.imgur.com/wejOmSz.jpg
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Maybe every time he was about to say something about it, he threw up in his mouth.
0
reply to: https://i.imgur.com/wejOmSz.jpg
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
I wonder what his public stance was on this when he was president. I know it wasnt an issue then, at least I dont think it was.
0
3 months ago
The Traditional troll post.
When you can't come up with anything else to say, pick on the gays.
We got the right to Marry. Too late for the hatters. There is nothing you can do

Voted: No, not under any circumstances
3 months ago
Next will be bestiality, and pedophilia ... and, since history repeats itself, the same people who advocate for gay marriage will advocate, in addition to pedos and animals, the latest perversion to make the abnormality rounds.
reply to: Next will be bestiality, and pedophilia ... and, since history repeats itself, the same people who advocate for gay marriage will advocate, in addition to pedos and animals, the latest perversion to make the abnormality round
3 months ago

Before you know it, married men will be having affairs with porn stars and running around grabbing women by the pussy.
reply to: Next will be bestiality, and pedophilia ... and, since history repeats itself, the same people who advocate for gay marriage will advocate, in addition to pedos and animals, the latest perversion to make the abnormality round
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Apparently you dont understand what consenting adults means.
reply to: Before you know it, married men will be having affairs with porn stars and running around grabbing women by the pussy.
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Or raping them as the Governor of Arkansas and then abusing power by having affairs with interns while serving as president.
reply to: Or raping them as the Governor of Arkansas and then abusing power by having affairs with interns while serving as president.
3 months ago
SO..do you have the link to that Rape trial? I'm interested in reading up on some history
reply to: SO..do you have the link to that Rape trial? I'm interested in reading up on some history
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
I dont think there was a trial for any of the rapes, but there are a number of accusations. And for the abuse of power I believe its pretty much public knowledge and wrong-doing I believe was admitted to (although I think that came after the perjury)
0
reply to: I dont think there was a trial for any of the rapes, but there are a number of accusations. And for the abuse of power I believe its pretty much public knowledge and wrong-doing I believe was admitted to (although I think tha
3 months ago
Ahh..so in your eyes, he's guilty until proven innocent because he lied about getting a blowjob?
0
reply to: Before you know it, married men will be having affairs with porn stars and running around grabbing women by the pussy.
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
reply to: Apparently you dont understand what consenting adults means.
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
It doesnt matter what it means. Its only a matter of time until the next push to change the definition again.
0
reply to: It doesnt matter what it means. Its only a matter of time until the next push to change the definition again.
3 months ago
Like the push to change the definition of "Murder"
reply to: Like the push to change the definition of "Murder"
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
No. I think "murder" is properly defined. It's abortion that needs to be illegal. Then, it would fit neatly under the proper and accepted definition.

We don't want to change the meaning of the words to fit our beliefs, we want them to mean what everyone expects them to mean.

To your point abortion, at this point in time is not, technically murder--but that is what should be changed. Not the word.
0
reply to: No. I think "murder" is properly defined. It's abortion that needs to be illegal. Then, it would fit neatly under the proper and accepted definition. We don't want to change the meaning of the words to fit our beliefs, we wa
3 months ago
No...

You said, "Abortion was murder"
I said it was not because Abomurder is defined as the uinlawful premiditated taking of a life.
Since Aborition is legal, it is impossible to be called murder
THis circular argument is getting quite tiresome, but you know techinically I am 100% correct until you outlaw Abortion. Pro or not..that is a fact.

If you haven't noticed, we are both off topic
0
reply to: No... You said, "Abortion was murder" I said it was not because Abomurder is defined as the uinlawful premiditated taking of a life. Since Aborition is legal, it is impossible to be called murder THis circular argument i
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Reread my last comment. I agreed with that logic. It is not murder but needs to be made illegal so it is murder
0
reply to: Reread my last comment. I agreed with that logic. It is not murder but needs to be made illegal so it is murder
3 months ago
Well, you and I both know...that will never happen
0
reply to: Well, you and I both know...that will never happen
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Never Say Never. Did you ever think you would have a black man and then Donald Trump as president?
0
reply to: Apparently you dont understand what consenting adults means.
Voted: No, not under any circumstances
3 months ago
Apparently, you have no concept or appreciation of the historical record. Also, you obviously have no comprehension of the written word as is evidenced by your attempt at a response.
0
reply to: Apparently, you have no concept or appreciation of the historical record. Also, you obviously have no comprehension of the written word as is evidenced by your attempt at a response.
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
And you clearly dont kbow what "consenting adults means".. which part do you not understand? Consent? Or adult? You like force or children?
reply to: And you clearly dont kbow what "consenting adults means".. which part do you not understand? Consent? Or adult? You like force or children?
Voted: No, not under any circumstances
3 months ago
You really should get out more. Your brain has obviously atrophied. Try to keep up ... even though we all understand just how terribly difficult that is for you. And as an aside ... your consenting adult BS is just that ... it has enormous restricting limits. But an intelligent person would understand that and be more cautious with their comments.
reply to: And you clearly dont kbow what "consenting adults means".. which part do you not understand? Consent? Or adult? You like force or children?
Voted: No, not under any circumstances
3 months ago
well as an Adult i consent myself to owning a machine gun, and if you disagree, well obviously your against adults choosing what they do or own for themselves.
0
reply to: well as an Adult i consent myself to owning a machine gun, and if you disagree, well obviously your against adults choosing what they do or own for themselves.
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Mmmkay
0
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
All we need to do is change the meaning of one of those words. Presto you can marry a child or your dog

In fact, does anything specify that it must be an adult human? If not... Here we go.
0
reply to: All we need to do is change the meaning of one of those words. Presto you can marry a child or your dog In fact, does anything specify that it must be an adult human? If not... Here we go.
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Yes. "Consent" does. Why is the word consent so hard to understand for men like you?
reply to: Yes. "Consent" does. Why is the word consent so hard to understand for men like you?
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Are you saying that the word "consent" is only applied to adult humans? Where are you getting this from?
0
reply to: Are you saying that the word "consent" is only applied to adult humans? Where are you getting this from?
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Neither a minor nor an animal can give legal consent. It is not a hard concept. Maybe it is if you dont understand the meaning of consent. You should learn it.. you could get into trouble.
0
reply to: Neither a minor nor an animal can give legal consent. It is not a hard concept. Maybe it is if you dont understand the meaning of consent. You should learn it.. you could get into trouble.
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Thats "legal" consent. You never mentioned legal consent, just consent. And chuldren can marry before they are adults in some places. Plus, my dog gives me consent to do things all the time. When i want to rub his belly, he rolls over and allowa me giving me consent the only way he knows how. Is it my problem you dont understand his cues? Next you wont allow consent from foreigners if you dont speak their language?
0
reply to: Thats "legal" consent. You never mentioned legal consent, just consent. And chuldren can marry before they are adults in some places. Plus, my dog gives me consent to do things all the time. When i want to rub his belly, he r
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Yes, it is not hard to follow as we were speaking about LAWS. Do keep up. I really dont want to know what you do to your dog. Maybe you shoukd stay away from the peanutbutter.
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Come to think of it, I've changed my vote on this. I think homosexuals should be allowed to marry. And, in fact, they always have been allowed to. Their constitutional rights have never been infringed. No one has ever stopped a homosexual from getting married in the past. At least not to my knowledge as long as they were an adult.

There is absolutely nothing, and never has been anyting to stop them from marrying. So long as the person they marry is of the opposite gender.
0
reply to: Come to think of it, I've changed my vote on this. I think homosexuals should be allowed to marry. And, in fact, they always have been allowed to. Their constitutional rights have never been infringed. No one has ever stopped
3 months ago
Hah! The Constituion says nothing about marriage rights
reply to: Hah! The Constituion says nothing about marriage rights
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Noted. But that is irrelevant to the point, which is that homosexuals, like heterosexuals, have always been able to marry.
0
reply to: Noted. But that is irrelevant to the point, which is that homosexuals, like heterosexuals, have always been able to marry.
3 months ago
Yes they were. Pirates did and that means nothing. Men never traveled into space until recently and women have not voted until the beginning of the 20th century. THe answer is nonsensical and basically, I'd appreciate you admiutting that you are either a bigot of that you are bjust choosing to follow the conservative talking poins & party lines because I remember you saying something about you not being religous. As a person who cares about freedom & liberty, and regardless of whether you like ot or not, gay marriage is not up to you unless you plan to marry a gay person. This subject has been closed for a long time. I'm gay & I'm married. There is nothing you or anyone can or will be doing about that no matter how hard you huff & puff & whine.
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Once again, they are consitutionally given the right of the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS!
reply to: Once again, they are consitutionally given the right of the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS!
Voted: I am open minded and remain unconvinced by either side
3 months ago
I forgot about this, but glad that Washington included it when he wrote the Constitution.
reply to: I forgot about this, but glad that Washington included it when he wrote the Constitution.
Voted: Yes, by all means
3 months ago
Written by Jefferson, not Washington.
reply to: Written by Jefferson, not Washington.
3 months ago
Indeed

reply to: Indeed http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/300_portrait/2012/08/hemsley_a.jpg
Voted: I am open minded and remain unconvinced by either side
3 months ago
He was just a puppet. Weezy was the real mastermind.
reply to: He was just a puppet. Weezy was the real mastermind.
3 months ago
LOL
YES!!! Weezy was awesome
0
reply to: LOL YES!!! Weezy was awesome
Voted: Yes, by all means
More than a month ago
0
Voted: Yes, by all means
More than a month ago
Let's just write this question another way. Should Heterosexuals Be Allowed To Marry? See how stupid that sounds.
More than a month ago
I'm going to try and turn everyone gay.
Maybe I can get a job as a pre-school teacher and teach young boys that it is ok to love other boys
More than a month ago
I have never heard, or found in my own reasoning......ANY sensible argument against homosexuals being able to marry.
More than a month ago
No one has ever stopped a man and woman from marrying, to my knowledge, they dont usually get asked if they are homosexual or not.
0